Search This Blog

Thursday, August 5, 2010

My Take on the Same Sex Marriage Debate

I don't see what the big deal is with same sex marriage. I myself am in a same sex marriage. Same sex, every time. And I suspect that I'm not alone.

Quantity and quality standards are acceptable to both parties involved, but admittedly there isn't a great deal of innovation, and I want someone to explain to me what's wrong with that. She and I both know what works, so we continue to do it to one another.

I think that once a marriage is such that its constituents stop breaking out the riding crop and the vibrating plaid thermos, it elevates itself. It becomes a spiritual union that is expressed and shared in sex. People in same sex marriages should be proud of themselves. They have elevated human sexuality to its next level.

The social movement to ban same sex marriages puts pressure on guys like me to study the Kama Sutra, explore fetishism and purchase Viagra online, whereas a same sex marriage implies stability and a certain level of happiness with one another. In a same sex marriage, you don't have to buy those black leather head masks with a zipper at the mouth, or the orange tennis balls that you're supposed to duct tape into your spouse's jaw before you beat her with a rattan cane. And from what I've read, rattan is not cheap these days.

The fact that same sex marriage is under assault from the right puzzles me. They are generally my ideological enemies, but their social structure, at least as far as sex and marriage are concerned resemble mine in some imaginable way. Why would Republicans be protesting same sex marriages? I don't understand it

I think that same sex marriages should be afforded every constitutional protection that marriages with constantly changing sex enjoy. Why should hot couples get this really crazy sex life, and then have better marriage benefits as a result? Shouldn't the wild sex be its own reward?

Write your congressional representative and let him or her know that you don't have the time or energy to be the sexual dynamo that this movement against same sex marriage wants you to be, and that you won't stand for some watered down civil union jive either.

If you're good in bed, but the same in bed, it's good, and the sameness is no detriment; rather it is a badge of honor and an expression of love's constancy. If two people want to commit to each other, even if they continue to love one another the same way they've loved one another for years, that's fine by me.

I am actually not married, same or otherwise, but the funny in this one works a lot better from the perspective of one who is.

1 comment:

  1. this is the piece i could/would have written, had my smart pills worked...unlike the diet pills on the counter, you have to take them in order to feel the effect. my cousin said they were vitamins, so did the rabbit.

    this is the incisive yet accessible wit which belongs to a full-fledged blog--good luck chris.

    ReplyDelete